On the 18th greensite, the previous construction company made a cut somewhat according to plan. About 50 meters long and 20 meters wide, it was to be for a bunker, with the green above and to its left.
Now this cut is being smoothed out and widened to make it look like a dip in the hillside. The straight formal gouges will disappear and be replaced with long flowing lines. The green will now go where the gouged bunker was planned, with a hillside to its left. It will feel a little like the golfer is playing downhill to the hole.
The idea is to allow the golfers attacking along the ridge (to the right of the centerline) to have a straight shot at the green’s depth, while golfers bailing to the safe left side will have a shallower target, and a green sloping away from them. They will be able to feed the ball off the hillside down to the green, but pulling off this shot will require superb judgment, and insert a element of risk.
From the tee or on the approach...Pick your poison wisely.
INSERT SKETCH
Tony Ristola
agolfarchitect.com
+1 (909) 581 0080
Tony Ristola
- www.tonyristola.com
- A rarity in golf course architecture: Working with the builders, crafting the details of my designs in the field on a daily basis.
Associated Blogs
Blog Archive
Short Project History; The Good and Bad
This blog reveals a snippet of the daily challenge of building a special golf course. The only value in something like this for future investors and golf architecture aficionados is to tell the truth; warts and all.
Before arriving at Sand Valley the project was being constructed according to the "detailed plans" of another golf architect using a "golf course construction company" that had built a number of courses. They broke ground in June 2006. After 10-months the builder had proceeded to rape 14-holes and was fired.
I have been brought in to fix the problem, using locals to build the course. In the process all plans except the general routing scheme have been abandoned. The current course is being designed in the field, seizing every opportunity to improve the course as we go. That's the value of time. You can see the project from all angles, in all conditions, you have time to think about the problems and come up with the best solutions, and then refine them with the guys doing the building... in real-time. This is how many of the great courses were constructed. It only makes sense. More time, more input, more communication produces the best possible result.
That's why Sand Valley, though it had a rough start (using the "Typical Method") should have a fantastic finish.
Before arriving at Sand Valley the project was being constructed according to the "detailed plans" of another golf architect using a "golf course construction company" that had built a number of courses. They broke ground in June 2006. After 10-months the builder had proceeded to rape 14-holes and was fired.
I have been brought in to fix the problem, using locals to build the course. In the process all plans except the general routing scheme have been abandoned. The current course is being designed in the field, seizing every opportunity to improve the course as we go. That's the value of time. You can see the project from all angles, in all conditions, you have time to think about the problems and come up with the best solutions, and then refine them with the guys doing the building... in real-time. This is how many of the great courses were constructed. It only makes sense. More time, more input, more communication produces the best possible result.
That's why Sand Valley, though it had a rough start (using the "Typical Method") should have a fantastic finish.
